Arborist Guides

Wood Chipper Risk Assessment UK

A wood chipper risk assessment identifies the hazards involved in operating a wood chipper during arborist work and sets out the control measures required to carry out the operation safely. Wood chippers are among the highest-risk pieces of equipment used in commercial tree surgery — entanglement, ejected debris and operator positioning are serious hazards that require formal assessment.

This guide covers the key hazards of chipper operation, what control measures must be in place, the legal requirements that apply under PUWER and the Management of Health and Safety Regulations, and how a wood chipper risk assessment connects to your wider arborist RAMS system.

What is it?

What is a wood chipper risk assessment?

A wood chipper risk assessment is a structured document identifying the hazards associated with feeding, operating and positioning a wood chipper during arborist work, assessing the risk level for each hazard, and setting out the controls that will reduce those risks to an acceptable level before work begins.

For commercial arborist work, chipper risk assessment is not a standalone document — it forms part of the wider RAMS submission alongside chainsaw risk assessments, climbing risk assessments, site-specific information and method statements. Commercial clients and principal contractors reviewing RAMS expect to see chipper hazards specifically addressed rather than covered by a generic reference to “machinery use”.

Wood chippers account for a disproportionate number of serious injuries in arboriculture. HSE statistics and AFAG guidance consistently identify chipper entanglement and ejection as serious hazards requiring specific assessment and control — not generic reference.
ArbDesk arborist RAMS documents preview

ArbDesk RAMS system — Wood-chipper Risk Assessment Preview – structured for UK commercial arborist work.

Key hazards

Hazards in a wood chipper risk assessment

Entanglement in infeed rollers

The most serious chipper hazard. Clothing, limbs or hair being pulled into the infeed by the feed rollers — potentially fatal. Operator training, positioning, clothing controls and emergency stop familiarity must all be addressed.

Ejection and kickback

Material ejected from the infeed chute or kicked back by the drum — including branches, stones, offcuts and debris. Operator positioning relative to the infeed, PPE and exclusion zone management must be addressed.

Flying debris from discharge

Wood chips and debris ejected at high velocity from the discharge chute. Discharge direction, exclusion zone for bystanders, PPE for persons within the risk zone.

Manual handling — feeding

Lifting, carrying and feeding heavy branches into the infeed — particularly relevant for large diameter material or prolonged operations. Team handling procedures, feeding technique and material size limits.

Noise and hearing damage

High noise levels during chipper operation — HAVS and hearing damage risk. Hearing protection for all persons within the noise zone, exposure time monitoring for prolonged operations.

Exhaust fumes

Carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon exposure during petrol or diesel chipper operation — particularly in enclosed spaces or with the engine positioned near operatives. Positioning and ventilation controls required.

Towing and positioning hazards

Chipper positioning on uneven ground, reversing with trailer, coupling and decoupling, and stability during operation. Towing competence, ground assessment and spotter requirements.

Public interface

Members of the public entering the work area — particularly relevant when operating in parks, footpaths and residential environments. Exclusion zone, banksmen, discharge direction management.

Control measures

Control measures for wood chipper operations

Before starting

  • Pre-use check completed and recorded — emergency stop, infeed controls, guards
  • Exclusion zone established for ejection and kickback risk
  • Discharge chute directed away from public areas and team members
  • Ground stability assessed — no operation on significantly sloping ground without controls
  • Operator confirmed as trained and competent on this specific chipper
  • All team members briefed on emergency stop location and procedure

During operation

  • Full PPE worn — helmet, eye protection, hearing protection, gloves, chainsaw boots
  • No loose clothing, untied hair or dangling lanyards near infeed
  • Never reach into the infeed chute — use feed tools for small material
  • Feed from the side — never stand directly in line with the infeed
  • Exclusion zone maintained — banksman monitors during operation
  • Machine stopped before any adjustment, blockage clearance or inspection
Legal framework

PUWER and the legal basis for chipper risk assessment

Built from real commercial work

Written by a practising arborist

ArbDesk was built by Christian, a working arborist with direct experience submitting RAMS to principal contractors, local authorities and commercial clients across the UK. Every document in the ArbDesk system reflects what actually gets reviewed on commercial sites — not what a generic H&S template assumes reviewers want to see.

The system has been shaped by real submission feedback — what causes rejections, what gets accepted first time, and what commercial clients and councils actually check when they review arborist documentation.

“Proper system built around how arborist work actually runs. Not just a generic template.”

A
Alexander AG Arborcare — Commercial Arborist, Surrey
Common questions

Wood chipper risk assessment — frequently asked questions

Yes. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 require suitable and sufficient risk assessments for all work activities, including wood chipper operation. PUWER 1998 requires that work equipment is suitable, maintained and used safely by trained operators — and a risk assessment is part of demonstrating that the hazards have been properly considered. For commercial work, a chipper risk assessment will also be required contractually as part of the RAMS submission.
There is no single mandatory qualification for wood chipper operation in the UK. PUWER requires that operators have received adequate information, instruction and training for the specific machine being used. AFAG guidance recommends formal chipper training — either manufacturer training or a recognised course such as those offered by LANTRA or City & Guilds. Many commercial clients and principal contractors specify training requirements in their contract conditions. Records of training should be kept and available for inspection.
There is no single prescribed exclusion zone size for chipper operation — the appropriate size depends on the machine, the discharge direction and the potential for material to travel during operation. AFAG guidance recommends that the discharge chute is directed away from persons and the exclusion zone reflects the potential for kickback and ejection. The risk assessment should specify the exclusion zone size for the specific operation and explain how it was determined.
The chipper should be positioned to allow safe feeding from the side, with the discharge directed away from public areas, other operatives and any areas where material could cause damage. Ground stability should be assessed before positioning — chippers should not be operated on significantly sloping ground without risk controls. The engine exhaust should be positioned to minimise operator fume exposure. The positioning should be documented in the site-specific risk assessment or method statement.
At minimum: helmet with face screen, ear defenders, chainsaw-rated gloves, and chainsaw boots. Eye protection should be worn during infeed operation. For prolonged operations generating significant dust, RPE (respiratory protective equipment) should be considered. All persons within the operating exclusion zone — not just the operator — should wear appropriate PPE. PPE requirements should be linked specifically to chipper hazards in the risk assessment rather than listed generically.
The chipper risk assessment should be consistent with the method statement and site-specific assessment in the RAMS submission. If the method statement describes chipper operation as a step in the arborist operation, the risk assessment should address the specific hazards of that step. The COSHH assessment should cover exhaust fumes and dust where relevant, and the pre-use check records should confirm the chipper was inspected before operation. These documents together form a coherent safety management record for the operation.
ArbDesk

Get your wood chipper risk assessment included

The ArbDesk Pro Pack includes wood chipper risk assessment as part of a complete commercial RAMS system — alongside chainsaw, stump grinder, climbing and equipment assessments, all structured for UK commercial submissions.

Instant access · No app · No subscription · Fully editable documents