Arborist Guides

Tree Surgery Risk Assessment Template UK

A tree surgery risk assessment template provides a structured way to identify hazards, assess risk and define control measures for arborist work. For commercial tree work in the UK, a risk assessment must be suitable and sufficient — meaning it must genuinely reflect the hazards of the specific work being carried out, not repeat a generic list that could apply to any trade.

This guide covers what a professional tree surgery risk assessment must include, the hazards specific to arboricultural work that it must address, how risk rating works in practice, and why generic templates consistently fail to satisfy commercial site requirements.

What is it?

What is a tree surgery risk assessment?

A risk assessment is a structured document that identifies the hazards associated with a work activity, determines the people who might be harmed and how, evaluates the level of risk, and sets out the control measures that will be used to reduce those risks to an acceptable level. For tree surgery, this must cover a wide range of activities and equipment — from ground-based chainsaw work and chipper operation through to aerial climbing, rigging and MEWP use.

In commercial arborist work, the risk assessment forms one half of a RAMS submission — the other being the method statement that describes how the work will actually be carried out. Both are required by commercial clients and principal contractors before work can begin on site. A risk assessment alone, without an accompanying method statement, does not constitute a complete RAMS submission.

A risk assessment must be suitable and sufficient for the specific work being carried out. A generic list of hazards that could apply to any trade does not meet this standard — and commercial clients can identify immediately when a document has not been genuinely prepared for the job.
ArbDesk arborist RAMS documents preview

ArbDesk RAMS system — structured for UK commercial arborist work.

What to include

What a tree surgery risk assessment template must include

Hazard identification

Clear, specific identification of hazards relevant to arborist work — not generic categories. Each hazard should be named specifically: “chainsaw kickback during pruning” rather than just “chainsaw use”.

Persons at risk

Who specifically may be harmed by each hazard — operators, other operatives, members of the public, site users, residents. The persons at risk should be specific to the situation, not generic.

Initial risk rating

Assessment of the likelihood and severity of harm before controls are applied, typically on a 1-5 x 1-5 matrix producing a risk score. This demonstrates that risks have been evaluated, not just listed.

Control measures

Specific, practical actions that will reduce the risk. Controls must be linked to the actual hazard and reflect how the work will be carried out on site — not generic statements like “wear PPE” without specification.

Residual risk rating

Assessment of the risk level after controls are applied. This demonstrates that the controls are adequate — if the residual risk is still high, additional controls are required before work can proceed safely.

Review and sign-off

The assessment should be signed by the person responsible for the work and show a review date. On commercial sites, operatives may also be required to sign confirmation that they have read and understood the assessment.

Arborist-specific hazards

Key hazards in tree surgery risk assessments

A professional tree surgery risk assessment must address the full range of hazards specific to arboricultural work. The following are the core hazard categories that should be covered in any commercial submission — generic industrial hazard lists that miss these will immediately identify a document as unsuitable.

Ground-based chainsaw operations

Kickback, cutting contact, chain/bar failure, entanglement, exhaust fumes. Must address operator positioning, PPE specification, chain brake testing and bystander exclusion.

Aerial tree work and climbing

Fall from height, equipment failure, tree structure failure, aerial rescue requirements. Must address climbing system inspection, rescue planning and climber-ground crew communication.

Rigging and sectional dismantling

Uncontrolled lowering, anchor failure, ground crew exposure. Must address rigging point assessment, load estimation, lowering speed control and exclusion zone management.

Falling timber and debris

Uncontrolled falling branches, sections and debris outside the intended drop zone. Must address exclusion zone sizing, drop zone definition and chipper feed management.

Wood chipper operations

Entanglement, ejection, kickback, noise and vibration. Must address operator training, PPE, infeed controls, emergency stop testing and exclusion zone requirements.

Public interface

Unauthorised public access, pedestrian exposure to falling debris, vehicle movement near public. Must address exclusion zone type and size, banksmen, signage and management of breaches.

Manual handling

Lifting and carrying timber, equipment and machinery. Must address timber section size limits, team lifting procedures and equipment-assisted handling for heavy items.

Noise, vibration and dust

HAVS from chainsaw and machinery use, respirable wood dust. Must address exposure limits, rotation controls, RPE requirements and monitoring arrangements for prolonged operations.

Risk rating

How risk rating works in practice for tree surgery

Risk rating is the process of evaluating the level of risk associated with each hazard before and after controls are applied. Most professional RAMS systems use a likelihood x severity matrix — where both factors are scored 1 to 5, producing a risk score from 1 to 25. This gives a structured, reproducible way of demonstrating that risks have been evaluated rather than just listed.

Likelihood score (1-5)

  • 1 — Very unlikely: controls virtually eliminate occurrence
  • 2 — Unlikely: would require unusual combination of circumstances
  • 3 — Possible: could occur under normal working conditions
  • 4 — Likely: occurs regularly in similar operations
  • 5 — Very likely: certain to occur without controls

Severity score (1-5)

  • 1 — Negligible: minor discomfort, no first aid required
  • 2 — Minor: first aid required, short absence
  • 3 — Moderate: medical treatment, extended absence
  • 4 — Major: serious injury, hospitalisation
  • 5 — Catastrophic: fatality or permanent disability
Legal framework

The legislation behind tree surgery risk assessments

Built from real commercial work

Written by a practising arborist

ArbDesk was built by Christian, a working arborist with direct experience submitting RAMS to principal contractors, local authorities and commercial clients across the UK. Every document in the ArbDesk system reflects what actually gets reviewed on commercial sites — not what a generic H&S template assumes reviewers want to see.

The system has been shaped by real submission feedback — what causes rejections, what gets accepted first time, and what commercial clients and councils actually check when they review arborist documentation.

“Proper system built around how arborist work actually runs. Not just a generic template.”

A
Alexander AG Arborcare — Commercial Arborist, Surrey
Common questions

Tree surgery risk assessment — frequently asked questions

Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, employers with five or more employees must record their risk assessments. Self-employed arborists with fewer than five employees are not legally required to write down their assessments — but for any commercial or council work, a written risk assessment will almost certainly be required contractually as part of the RAMS submission. In practice, any arborist carrying out commercial work should have written risk assessments regardless of company size.
Specific enough to demonstrate that the hazard has been genuinely considered in the context of arborist work. “Chainsaw kickback during aerial pruning operations” is specific; “chainsaw use” is not. “Public access to exclusion zone on footpath adjacent to work area” is specific; “public interface” is not. Commercial clients can identify generic hazard lists immediately — specificity is what demonstrates genuine assessment rather than box-ticking.
The core risk assessment hazards and control measures for arborist work — chainsaw use, climbing, chipper operation — can remain consistent between similar jobs. What must be adapted for every job is the site-specific information and any unusual hazards specific to the location. A template system allows the consistent elements to be retained while site-specific sections are completed for each new job.
A risk assessment identifies the hazards, the people at risk and the control measures. A method statement describes how the work will actually be carried out in practice. RAMS — Risk Assessment and Method Statement — combines both into a single commercial submission. For most commercial arborist work, both elements are required. Submitting a risk assessment alone without a method statement does not constitute a complete RAMS submission.
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 require risk assessments to be “suitable and sufficient” — which means they must identify all significant risks, address the people who may be harmed, reflect the actual hazards of the specific work, and result in appropriate controls. A suitable and sufficient assessment for tree surgery should specifically address the arboricultural hazards listed in AFAG guidance, be adapted to the specific site being worked on, and produce controls that are realistic and proportionate to the level of risk.
Control measures should be specific enough to be meaningful — “wear appropriate PPE” is less useful than “chainsaw trousers, gloves, helmet with visor and ear defenders worn at all times during chainsaw operation.” Generic controls that appear on every risk assessment regardless of the specific hazard signal to reviewers that the assessment has not been genuinely completed. Where the same control measure does apply to multiple hazards (for example, exclusion zone management), it should be stated consistently but specifically each time.
ArbDesk

Get a professional tree surgery risk assessment system

ArbDesk gives you structured, arborist-specific risk assessments built for UK commercial submissions — with hazard-based templates, risk scoring and control measures developed from real commercial site experience.

Instant access · No app · No subscription · Fully editable documents