Arborist Guides

Near Miss Reporting for Arborists UK

Near miss reporting helps arborists record events that could have caused injury, damage or disruption — even where no one was hurt. For commercial tree work, a documented reporting system shows that site safety is actively monitored, not just planned before the job starts.

This guide covers what counts as a near miss in tree surgery, what a report should include, the legal framework behind near miss reporting, and how to build a system that satisfies commercial site expectations.

What is it?

What is a near miss in arborist work?

A near miss is an unplanned event that did not cause injury or damage, but had the potential to do so. In tree surgery, near misses occur regularly across climbing, chainsaw operations, rigging, chipper use, vehicle movement and public interaction — and the vast majority go unrecorded.

Recording near misses is how professional businesses identify weaknesses in planning, communication, equipment, site setup or working methods before a more serious incident occurs. A near miss is not a failure — it is valuable information about what nearly went wrong and why, which can be used to prevent the same situation from becoming an accident.

A near miss record is not about blame. It is about learning from what nearly went wrong and improving how the work is controlled. Businesses that record and act on near misses have fewer serious incidents.
Examples in tree work

What counts as a near miss in tree surgery?

Near misses in arborist work fall across several categories — equipment, public interface, communication, ground conditions and environmental factors. The following are common examples that should be recorded whenever they occur.

Falling debris outside the drop zone

A branch or section lands outside the intended exclusion zone but causes no injury or damage. Should trigger a review of exclusion zone size and rigging controls.

Public access breach

A member of the public enters or approaches the work area during operations — including through gaps in barriers, around signs, or past an unattended access point.

Equipment defect found before use

A pre-use check identifies a defect that could have caused injury if the equipment had been used — chain brake failure, worn harness stitching, cracked chipper guard.

Vehicle or machinery movement risk

A vehicle, trailer or machinery movement creates a risk to operatives, pedestrians or site users — reversing without a banksman, a trailer coupling failure, or equipment rolling on a slope.

Communication failure

Ground staff and a climber misunderstand instructions, creating a risk during cutting, lowering or rigging operations — a misheard signal, a blocked line of sight, or an unexpected action.

Slip, trip or ground hazard

An operative slips, trips or nearly falls due to uneven ground, brash, wet timber or poor access — particularly relevant during chipper feed, timber handling and site clearance.

Chainsaw kickback or unexpected movement

A chainsaw kicks back, binds unexpectedly or moves in an unintended direction during cutting — even if no contact is made, this is a significant near miss requiring investigation.

Overhead line proximity

A branch, section or equipment comes closer than the safe working distance to an overhead line — including during felling, rigging or machinery positioning.

What to record

What a near miss report should include

A near miss report should be simple enough to complete quickly on site but detailed enough to be useful when reviewed later. The following elements should be included in every near miss record.

Essential information

  • Date, time and location of the event
  • Names of people involved or potentially affected
  • Clear description of what happened
  • What the potential consequence could have been
  • Immediate action taken at the time
  • Corrective action required going forward
  • Person responsible for follow-up action
  • Confirmation that the issue has been closed out

What to do after recording

  • Review the report against the relevant RAMS and method statement
  • Identify whether the control measures in place were adequate
  • Decide whether RAMS, exclusion zones or briefings need updating
  • Brief the team on what happened and what changes are being made
  • Retain the record — it is evidence of active safety management
  • Consider whether the event meets RIDDOR reporting thresholds
  • File alongside site briefing records and equipment check records
UK Legal Framework

The legal basis for near miss reporting in arborist work

Near miss reporting is not just good practice — it sits within a legal framework that requires arborists to manage risks actively and learn from events that could cause harm. The following legislation is relevant:

Why it matters commercially

Why near miss reporting matters for commercial tree work

Commercial clients, councils and principal contractors want evidence that safety is managed throughout the job — not just planned before arrival. A near miss reporting system provides that evidence by showing that unsafe events are identified, recorded, acted on and used to improve how the work is controlled.

Demonstrates active safety management

A business that records near misses is demonstrably managing safety in practice, not just on paper. This is exactly what commercial clients and HSE inspectors look for.

Strengthens RAMS submissions

Having a near miss reporting system in place — and being able to show records — is a mark of professional operational management that distinguishes serious arborist businesses from others.

Reduces serious incident risk

Near misses are early warnings. Addressing the root cause of a near miss — exclusion zone size, communication protocol, equipment condition — prevents the same situation becoming an accident.

Provides legal protection

If a serious incident does occur, documented near miss records demonstrate that safety was being actively managed and that lessons were being learned — not ignored.

Preview of ArbDesk arborist near miss reporting and safety records for UK commercial tree work

ArbDesk site safety records — near miss/incident reporting, structured for UK commercial arborist work. (included in Pro Pack)

Built from real commercial work

Written by a practising arborist

The ArbDesk near miss and incident reporting system was built by Christian, a working arborist with direct experience of what commercial sites expect when they review your safety management records. The report format in ArbDesk is structured to be quick to complete on site without being so simple that it fails to capture the information needed for genuine investigation and improvement.

Near miss records in ArbDesk are designed to sit alongside site briefing records, equipment pre-use checks and RAMS documents — forming a complete, coherent safety management record for every commercial job.

“Proper system built around how arborist work actually runs. Not just a generic template.”

A
Alexander AG Arborcare — Commercial Arborist, Surrey
Common questions

Near miss reporting — frequently asked questions

There is no specific legal requirement to record every near miss — but the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 require risk assessments to be reviewed when there is reason to believe they are no longer valid, and the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 creates a general duty to manage risks actively. A near miss is clear evidence that something in the risk controls may need attention. Separately, certain dangerous occurrences must be reported to the HSE under RIDDOR 2013 regardless of whether injury occurred.
A near miss is a broad term for any event that could have caused harm but did not. A dangerous occurrence is a specific category defined under RIDDOR 2013 — a list of events that must be reported to the HSE regardless of whether injury occurred. Dangerous occurrences relevant to arborist work include the unintended collapse of scaffolding or lifting equipment, incidents involving overhead power lines, and the unintentional release of any substance that could cause harm. All dangerous occurrences are near misses — but most near misses are not RIDDOR dangerous occurrences.
If a near miss escalates into a serious incident that triggers HSE involvement, documented near miss records can demonstrate that safety was being actively managed. An HSE inspector will look at whether risks were identified and acted on, whether the incident was foreseeable, and whether the business took reasonable steps to prevent it. Businesses with documented near miss records that show active follow-up and improvement are in a significantly stronger position than those with no records at all.
Near miss records should be kept in a consistent, accessible format alongside other site safety records — site briefing records, equipment check records and RAMS documents. Records should be retained for a minimum of three years. On principal contractor sites, the principal contractor may require copies of near miss records as part of their site safety management system. Having records in a structured, dated format makes retrieval straightforward.
Increasingly, yes. Principal contractors and local authorities conducting pre-qualification assessments or site audits often ask whether a contractor has a near miss reporting system in place and may ask to see recent records. Having a documented system — and being able to demonstrate that near misses are acted on and used to improve safety — is a mark of professional safety management that distinguishes serious arborist businesses from those with purely reactive paperwork.
Near miss records should be reviewed alongside RAMS documents. If a near miss occurs during a specific operation — wood chipper use, climbing, rigging — the relevant risk assessment and method statement should be reviewed to establish whether the controls were adequate. If the near miss reveals a gap in the RAMS, the documents should be updated before the same operation is carried out again. This closed loop between near miss recording and RAMS review is what makes near miss reporting genuinely useful rather than just a paperwork exercise.
The most common mistakes are: only recording actual injuries rather than near misses; completing the report but failing to assign or follow up corrective action; treating reports as a blame exercise rather than an improvement tool; keeping records separate from the rest of the site safety system; and not reviewing RAMS and method statements when a near miss reveals a gap in the controls. A simple, consistent system that is actually used and acted on is far more valuable than a comprehensive template that sits empty.
ArbDesk Pro Pack

Site records that support commercial RAMS

The ArbDesk Pro Pack includes the full RAMS system plus near miss and incident reporting, daily site briefing records, work area checks and equipment pre-use checks — everything needed for a complete commercial site safety record.

Instant access  ·  No app  ·  No subscription  ·  Fully editable documents